From owner-freebsd-questions  Mon Apr  8 12:27:01 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id MAA20277
          for questions-outgoing; Mon, 8 Apr 1996 12:27:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.think.com (Mail1.Think.COM [131.239.33.245])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA20272
          for <questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 8 Apr 1996 12:26:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Early-Bird-1.Think.COM by mail.think.com; Mon, 8 Apr 96 15:26:28 -0400
Received: from compound.think.com ([206.10.99.151]) by Early-Bird.Think.COM; Mon, 8 Apr 96 15:26:23 EDT
Received: (from alk@localhost) by compound.think.com (8.7.5/8.6.112) id OAA02194; Mon, 8 Apr 1996 14:26:32 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 1996 14:26:32 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <199604081926.OAA02194@compound.think.com>
From: Tony Kimball <alk@Think.COM>
To: questions@freebsd.org
Subject: weak symbols
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

To answer my own question:  Just patch gcc not to emit .weak
directives.

I should have though to search the archives *before* posting
the question.  Sorry.