From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Nov 10 14:56:44 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04AA516A41F;
	Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:56:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danger@rulez.sk)
Received: from mail.rulez.sk (DaEmoN.RuLeZ.sK [84.16.32.226])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BF8B43D48;
	Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:56:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danger@rulez.sk)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.rulez.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 629781CD6E;
	Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:56:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: from danger.mcrn.sk (danger.mcrn.sk [84.16.37.254])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.rulez.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C08141CD4F;
	Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:56:37 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:55:52 +0100
From: Daniel Gerzo <danger@rulez.sk>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.5) UNREG / CD5BF9353B3B7091
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <1176299575.20051110155552@rulez.sk>
To: "Andrew P." <infofarmer@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <cb5206420511100647h5fbc1946n88f3fac1e449e758@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA513920FC73A14B964AB258D77EA8D60B559A@mx1.masongeneral.com>
	<200511091224.13143.kirk@strauser.com>
	<200511091044.04253.kstewart@owt.com>
	<200511091313.50741.kirk@strauser.com> <43725078.6000303@freebsd.org>
	<cb5206420511100647h5fbc1946n88f3fac1e449e758@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature";
	micalg=sha1; boundary="----------661C921A37A90064"
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.rulez.sk
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.569 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, AWL=0.830, BAYES_00=-2.599]
X-Spam-Score: -3.569
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re[2]: cvsup vs. portsnap (was Re: cvsup problem)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Daniel Gerzo <danger@rulez.sk>
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:56:44 -0000


This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format.

------------661C921A37A90064
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Szia Andrew,

Thursday, November 10, 2005, 3:47:32 PM, you wrote:

> There are a couple more points against portsnap:
> - it lags behind by a few hours.

Actually, even cvsup is behind by a few hours, if you are not syncing
agains cvsup-master (to which only official cvsup mirrors have access,
and maybe even not all of them :)) so it depends on how often is your
cvsup-mirror beeing sinced.

> - setting up a mirror is still undocumented

--=20
Sincerely,
  Daniel Gerzo

------------661C921A37A90064--