From owner-freebsd-chat  Sun Mar  2 15:50:47 1997
Return-Path: <owner-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA11062
          for chat-outgoing; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 15:50:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from crh.cl.msu.edu (crh.cl.msu.edu [35.8.1.24])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA11056
          for <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 15:50:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from henrich@localhost)
          by crh.cl.msu.edu (8.8.5/8.8.4)
	  id SAA00933; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 18:50:00 -0500 (EST)
From: Charles Henrich <henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu>
Message-Id: <199703022350.SAA00933@crh.cl.msu.edu>
Subject: Re: 2.2 Compiler slower than 2.1? (was RSA 56-bit key challenge)
To: jmb@freefall.freebsd.org (Jonathan M. Bresler)
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 1997 18:50:00 -0500 (EST)
Cc: hasty@rah.star-gate.com, scrappy@hub.org, ejs@bfd.com, jkh@time.cdrom.com,
        taob@risc.org, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199703022310.PAA08685@freefall.freebsd.org> from "Jonathan M. Bresler" at "Mar 2, 97 03:10:19 pm"
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Hell I can compile with just -O and get almost the same performance as all
thost gcc opts that are present.  The difference is in the noise even.

-Crh

       Charles Henrich     Michigan State University     henrich@msu.edu

                         http://pilot.msu.edu/~henrich