From owner-cvs-all  Thu Mar  8 17: 3:20 2001
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 622FA37B718; Thu,  8 Mar 2001 17:03:16 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from obrien@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f2913GQ88940;
	Thu, 8 Mar 2001 17:03:16 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from obrien)
Message-Id: <200103090103.f2913GQ88940@freefall.freebsd.org>
From: "David E. O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 17:03:16 -0800 (PST)
To: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: cvs commit: src/release/scripts doFS.sh
X-FreeBSD-CVS-Branch: HEAD
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

obrien      2001/03/08 17:03:16 PST

  Modified files:
    release/scripts      doFS.sh 
  Log:
  newfs with `-m 1'
  
  This is needed even with `-o space' as the kernel decides to be "helpful"
  and not really do space optimization.  Looking at src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_alloc.c
  we see why:		if (fs->fs_minfree <= 5 ||
  		            fs->fs_cstotal.cs_nffree >
  		            (off_t)fs->fs_dsize * fs->fs_minfree / (2 * 100))
  			            break;
  	            log(LOG_NOTICE, "%s: optimization changed from SPACE to TIME\n"
  
  I have picked `1' vs. `0' just incase some code somewhere has the assumption
  the %free can never be `0'.
  
  Helped with understanding why -m 1 made a different:	imp
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.30      +2 -2      src/release/scripts/doFS.sh


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message