From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 20:43:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9142016A412 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 20:43:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from akachler@telcom.net) Received: from mail.telcom.net (mail.telcom.net [200.62.2.251]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 460B443D73 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 20:43:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from akachler@telcom.net) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (adsl-8-187-70.mia.bellsouth.net [65.8.187.70]) by mail.telcom.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8RKk5dq001486 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:46:07 -0400 Message-ID: <451AE254.3050603@telcom.net> Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:43:00 -0400 From: Arie Kachler Organization: Telcom.Net User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: pf/altq X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: akachler@telcom.net List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 20:43:10 -0000 Hello, We need to replace our bandwidth management solution because it's not working properly anymore. Does anybody have experience with pf/altq in high traffic production environments. We expect to run 100Mbps through each pf/altq box. Man pages don't show shortcomings one may experience in real life. Any real life experiences you can share will be greatly appreciated. Arie Kachler