From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 12 02:39:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0550B1065670 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 02:39:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.208.78.105]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9CC88FC16 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 02:39:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n9C2dCSL038836; Sun, 11 Oct 2009 19:39:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n9C2dCnx038835; Sun, 11 Oct 2009 19:39:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 19:39:12 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: Larry Rosenman Message-ID: <20091012023912.GA38822@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <6729ad0409e449f8dbda69ecd8feb618.squirrel@webmail.lerctr.org> <20091012014846.GB38325@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Scheduler weirdness X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 02:39:13 -0000 On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 08:51:48PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote: > > On Sun, October 11, 2009 8:48 pm, Steve Kargl wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 05:59:52PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote: > >> > >> Ok, running RELENG_8 from Friday (10/9/2009). > >> > >> If I have 4 Folding-at-home processes running (they nice themselves) the > >> system is slow as a dog. > >> > >> If I stop them, it's speedy. > >> > >> This is running SCHED_ULE > >> > >> is this expected? > >> > >> What can I do to help? > >> > > > > How many cpus are available on your system? If you're in an > > over-commit situation with numerical intensive applications, > > you may find 4BSD to be a better option. > 4 cpu's. > So, you have 4 cpus and 4 folding-at-home processes and you're trying to use the system with other apps? Switch to 4BSD. -- Steve