From owner-cvs-user Mon May 1 10:50:59 1995 Return-Path: cvs-user-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id KAA01675 for cvs-user-outgoing; Mon, 1 May 1995 10:50:59 -0700 Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.223.46]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA01669 ; Mon, 1 May 1995 10:50:56 -0700 Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id KAA23381; Mon, 1 May 1995 10:50:56 -0700 Received: (from phk@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id KAA03661; Mon, 1 May 1995 10:50:23 -0700 From: Poul-Henning Kamp Message-Id: <199505011750.KAA03661@ref.tfs.com> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/release Makefile To: ache@astral.msk.su (Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage) Date: Mon, 1 May 1995 10:50:23 -0700 (PDT) Cc: CVS-commiters@time.cdrom.com, cvs-user@time.cdrom.com, jkh@time.cdrom.com In-Reply-To: from "Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage" at May 1, 95 09:31:20 pm Content-Type: text Content-Length: 862 Sender: cvs-user-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > >> > Rename secure to DES. This isn't a 100% accurate renaming since some > >> > of the eBones stuff is in there too, but it's better than `secure', which > >> > implies that the user will be insecure without it. > >> > >> DES is very bad choice. Maybe 'crypto' is better name? > > >DES is indeed a very good name, it describes exactly what you don't > >have if you leave this packet out during installation. > > DES is only small part of what you don't have, also > you don't have eBones (aka Kerberos) and lot > of authentification stuff imbedded into various pgms, > you don't have encrypted telnet, etc. In short: You miss everything which relies on ... >DES< :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp -- TRW Financial Systems, Inc. 'All relevant people are pertinent' && 'All rude people are impertinent' => 'no rude people are relevant'