Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2024 17:57:55 +0100 From: Rainer Hurling <rhurlin@gwdg.de> To: Gleb Popov <arrowd@freebsd.org> Cc: "ports@FreeBSD.org" <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Call for help: moving manpages to share/man Message-ID: <e46a9574-b7bc-480d-b337-bd9a38841227@gwdg.de> In-Reply-To: <CALH631mTLUzSYEUr-sPfN_U%2By6-afFrsSrcJazazuQJqowTUOw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CALH631=312%2Bz8-1Gr32gZL_X3QduNCiMEyM3ZOwvqmAh6eRW7A@mail.gmail.com> <037984e5-d7de-4ea5-91ab-a4d90a7bb004@gwdg.de> <CALH631mTLUzSYEUr-sPfN_U%2By6-afFrsSrcJazazuQJqowTUOw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 21.01.24 um 17:53 schrieb Gleb Popov: > On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 7:45 PM Rainer Hurling <rhurlin@gwdg.de> wrote: >> >> All three ports do not generate any man pages. So I don't understand why >> they are included in the list. Or is it different if autotools is used? >> >> Thanks in advance for any clarification. > > Moin generated this list while working on the same problem for python > ports, so this list also contains these. You can just ignore them for > now. > The ports I'm interested in should have GNU_CONFIGURE=yes knob That's what I had hopped. Thanks for clarification.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?e46a9574-b7bc-480d-b337-bd9a38841227>