From owner-soc-status@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun  7 09:34:49 2011
Return-Path: <owner-soc-status@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: soc-status@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A543E1065670
	for <soc-status@freebsd.org>; Tue,  7 Jun 2011 09:34:49 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from nc3bhconc@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com
	[209.85.216.54])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F2258FC08
	for <soc-status@freebsd.org>; Tue,  7 Jun 2011 09:34:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by qwc9 with SMTP id 9so2895827qwc.13
	for <soc-status@freebsd.org>; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 02:34:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:from:date
	:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
	bh=GXk0D6GCcRreMyIK0+Bi8m1BaEARhbfUfuIITkr0uwE=;
	b=AfyNgSw62gGa1pOy6fBc+Vo8zc8wcIEic7nRORjLUuCACvEXtzS0+d1MOkPQxL1npJ
	VYSeYw+fR/+zuc+uRo14kFw4ynCxzaVpgtVA6UeNwRD6pC3J0CGuSndq+FL+f99tunts
	k/bnFa3HhZVvueGbMrNtapyM34FnGUSOacW8Q=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:sender:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id
	:subject:to:content-type;
	b=X9XjDSM783Xwx/38IUCNGOqamBeY5bzQjjFFrpg1sJdzC1vANG4Y4/7SBGwM9uWyIm
	BV6C+G/gD7haHUkItoRxEHvjqqmrb93y0AoYXYBDHYKrqSn6wNqKz6ier18gbSfsAEX/
	WrA+Uz4GQmLUP8xw54d/ucdYo2HDV8TtR5YqE=
Received: by 10.224.175.211 with SMTP id bb19mr2574318qab.95.1307439288200;
	Tue, 07 Jun 2011 02:34:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: nc3bhconc@gmail.com
Received: by 10.224.28.212 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 02:34:28 -0700 (PDT)
From: Catalin Nicutar <catalin.nicutar@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 12:34:28 +0300
X-Google-Sender-Auth: aULsIkvtlBfwrSow0tA6R8Ww8dA
Message-ID: <BANLkTim-FiLvTzk+SKMUkUSJ8s9Gbb9P4w@mail.gmail.com>
To: soc-status@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: TCP UTO - Weekly Report 2
X-BeenThere: soc-status@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Summer of Code Status Reports and Discussion <soc-status.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/soc-status>,
	<mailto:soc-status-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/soc-status>
List-Post: <mailto:soc-status@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:soc-status-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/soc-status>,
	<mailto:soc-status-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 09:34:49 -0000

Hello!

This is the second report for TCP UTO.

* Short TCP UTO description

UTO stands for User Timeout Option (it is described in RFC5482). TCP UTO
specifies a peer should be allowed to advertise its chosen `User Timeout'
for a connection.
The wiki page for this project: http://wiki.freebsd.org/CatalinNicutar/TCPUTO


* Work completed this week

I have added the following sysctls:
       net.inet.tcp.uto.enable            (global enable)
       net.inet.tcp.uto.adv_timeout    (default advertised timeout)
       net.inet.tcp.uto.max_timeout
       net.inet.tcp.uto.min_timeout

I have added the following socket options (IPPROTO_TCP):
       TCP_SNDUTO (local enable + specify advertised timeout)
       TCP_RCVUTO (enable accepting UTO suggestion)

Obviously things may change (I may have to add / remove options, change
semantics, names etc) but this is what I feel is needed for now.

* My goals for this week:
       * Send the TCP UTO option (correct packing with respect to other
       options)
       * Test the TCP option with tcpdump / other sniffers

This is all for report 2. If you have questions, suggestions or advices
drop me an email to cnicutar@FreeBSD.org.

Catalin Nicutar