From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 11 17:00:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C4AE16A4D0 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 17:00:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from anchor-post-35.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-35.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C26C443D46 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 17:00:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tnelson@onresolve.com) Received: from alcyon-home.demon.co.uk ([193.237.184.95] helo=lime) by anchor-post-35.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BuwSG-000Jr4-0Z; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 17:00:01 +0000 From: "Trent Nelson" To: , Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 17:59:58 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: <18300.12.148.147.242.1092234409.squirrel@[12.148.147.242]> Thread-Index: AcR/r6ZXSzk14IziSWawX4erDmN9cAAFDH4Q X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Message-Id: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 01:54:22 +0000 Subject: RE: Signal 11 compiling qt33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 17:00:03 -0000 > I just received this signal 11 while compiling qt33 on the snapshot from > 8/9 > Would updating my world solve this problem at all for me? This is the > latest (as of this morning) ports. Before everyone jumps in and suggests you have memory problems; I run into this problem every time I compile Qt sources on FreeBSD and I know a lot of other people have too. However, it never fails at the same spot, and I think you'll find if you just type 'make' again, it'll happily continue on from where it died. I typically have to run 'make' about 10-15 times before Qt will completely build. Compiling Qt in general is probably more strenuous on the system than doing a 'make world' due to the nature of their classes and such. I've never seen any problems with my hardware apart from this. I guess there always is the possibility I do have dodgy memory and this is the only thing that is stressing the system enough to make things break. Trent.