From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 22 01:06:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C7216A4DA for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 01:06:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mwlucas@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org) Received: from bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org (bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org [198.22.63.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 326C743D49 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 01:06:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mwlucas@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org) Received: from bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org (mwlucas@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k7M16Sfw096296 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:06:28 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mwlucas@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org) Received: (from mwlucas@localhost) by bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id k7M16STr096295 for ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:06:28 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mwlucas) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:06:28 -0400 From: "Michael W. Lucas" To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060822010628.GA96258@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Spam-Score: (0) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 Cc: Subject: "the best" port update tool X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 01:06:29 -0000 Hi, After a database headache caused by my own doofusity, I've been contemplating switching from portupgrade. (Hey, it's been a few years, things could have changed.) Checking in /usr/ports/sysutils, it seems that we have a whole bunch of different tools -- portmaster, portmanager, portsman, and portupgrade. A search of the mailing list archive doesn't seem to lead me to a clear successor or improvement upon portupgrade. Is portupgrade still as good as it gets, or are we headed towards another tool any time soon? Thanks, ==ml -- Michael W. Lucas mwlucas@FreeBSD.org, mwlucas@BlackHelicopters.org http://www.BlackHelicopters.org/~mwlucas/ Latest book: PGP & GPG -- http://www.pgpandgpg.com "The cloak of anonymity protects me from the nuisance of caring." -Non Sequitur