From owner-freebsd-net Wed Aug 8 13:25:23 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from smtp1.sentex.ca (smtp1.sentex.ca [199.212.134.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6097437B41A for ; Wed, 8 Aug 2001 13:25:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from simoeon.sentex.net (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by smtp1.sentex.ca (8.11.2/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f78KP8692694; Wed, 8 Aug 2001 16:25:08 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010808161744.0495abf0@marble.sentex.ca> X-Sender: mdtpop@marble.sentex.ca X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2001 16:18:53 -0400 To: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: gif MTU of 1280 ? Cc: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai , freebsd-net@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20010808202247.D20C77BB@starfruit.itojun.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org But where would the PMTU source address come from ? If someone is rejecting all RFC 1918 space at their border, if a ICMP message originates with such source address, would this not be problematic ? ---Mike At 05:22 AM 8/9/01 +0900, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino wrote: > private/global address doesn't change the situation at all. > >itojun To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message