From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 27 04:36:38 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC56E16A421 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 04:36:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.239]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77C6013C4B3 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 04:36:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i29so926514wxd for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 21:36:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=03GNLUpJMcSk6gSohKeezbjgX+n5TVVIcXP+ceKjqjI=; b=Y6XmfKib9ZjIvN6vxj794EbJy0C7da+bvEgKjXArMKh6yXGVtKodO4d40FL42AaSziHczAA1LzKBDfEPDYLQqIyv5uG+7Hxr1YpT4XESZrV+XlMta04K4FZN/URF3AllWM0DTrLC9xb5m45HR0cIsMj0RdJeklh+gzj6oEBRg1w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=acoqLaY4OTOce4v6m3uk130DOkDWAHfl/2PhH6HjThhryRYRmugr4ysXOZrqnTCZ6F0N4VFSOmg5Cfq7U3u/jzhpVUUQW48wPI7GY3WB3keNba8VpKQ4Tb2z2bxgjnDgpI2XFHezJb0cgJhXOrIV11IRWnAFJ1QagjQFUexMyBg= Received: by 10.70.50.10 with SMTP id x10mr6162568wxx.1193459797689; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 21:36:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.2.2? ( [67.85.89.184]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m33sm5450393ele.2007.10.26.21.36.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 26 Oct 2007 21:36:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4722BF50.4040805@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 00:32:16 -0400 From: "Aryeh M. Friedman" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071016) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "P.U.Kruppa" References: <4722BAC1.9030906@optonline.net> <20071027063215.K1571@small> In-Reply-To: <20071027063215.K1571@small> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org, "E. J. Cerejo" Subject: Re: Portupgrade used to be fun!!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 04:36:38 -0000 P.U.Kruppa wrote: > On Sat, 27 Oct 2007, E. J. Cerejo wrote: > >> Not anymore! Every time I cvsup my ports tree and I see all of those >> ports that need to be updated my belly aches and that's because >> portupgrade doesn't work the way it used to work. It is not fun any >> more! Always an issue, either a port conflicts with another port or >> it fails all together. I have forgotten the last time I updated my >> ports without any issues. Today scrollkeeper is conflicting with >> rarian, they install files on the same directory. > Did you have a look at /usr/ports/UPDATING ? > (I guess you have got a problem with the latest gnome.) >From my experience I think anyone upgrading on 8-CURRENT (and from reports perhaps 7-????) will have the same issue -- Aryeh M. Friedman FloSoft Systems Developer, not Business, Friendly http://www.flosoft-systems.com