From owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 21 18:58:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: multimedia@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44ADA170D8B for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:58:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from eastrmmtao04.cox.net (eastrmmtao04.cox.net [68.230.240.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEC3513C4B4 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:58:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from eastrmimpo01.cox.net ([68.1.16.119]) by eastrmmtao04.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.03 201-2131-130-104-20060516) with ESMTP id <20070221185845.SZMM27968.eastrmmtao04.cox.net@eastrmimpo01.cox.net>; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:58:45 -0500 Received: from mezz.mezzweb.com ([24.255.149.218]) by eastrmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id SJyl1W0064iy4EG0000000; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:58:45 -0500 Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:00:56 -0600 To: "Luigi Rizzo" From: "Jeremy Messenger" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20070221073447.A89386@xorpc.icir.org> <20070221095911.D90766@xorpc.icir.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20070221095911.D90766@xorpc.icir.org> User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.10 (Linux) Cc: multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: speex upgrade to 1.1.12 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Multimedia discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:58:47 -0000 On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:59:11 -0600, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 11:56:34AM -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote: >> On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 09:34:47 -0600, Luigi Rizzo wrot= e: >> >> > Hi, >> > we have two (conflicting) speex ports in the tree: >> > multimedia/speex which is version 1.0.5, source dated 07-May-2005 >> > multimedia/speex-devel which is version 1.1.12, source dated = >> 15-Feb-2006 >> > for which there is no maintainer other than this list. >> > >> > Some packages start checking for recent (1.1.x) version of speex, After checking, which port are you talking about? I only see one = (net/opal) and it is not depend on speex-devel by default. Unless, my gr= ep = is incorrect? >> > i think it would be good to upgrade multimedia/speex to 1.1.12 >> > rather than patching the various configure files. >> >> Get them to depend on speex-devel then. > > speex and speex-devel are conflicting. Since, the development version is backwards compatible then you can = uninstall speex and install speex-devel. All the ports will be still = thinking that you have speex when you try to install them. Also, we have= = pkgdb/portupgrade and portmaster that are smart enough to take care of i= t = when you update ports. You can add a check in Makefile for if speex exists, then mark it as = IGNORE and tell users to uninstall speex and install speex-devel. > And there are over 100 ports that depend on speex so if you > build speex-devel you won't be able to build those depending on speex > i believe. Over 100 vs 1 still doesn't give me a good reason to put a development = version in speex. >> > A comment in the CVS repository says that: >> > >> > = >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/audio/speex-devel/Makefil= e?rev=3D1.31&content-type=3Dtext/x-cvsweb-markup >> > >> > Speex 1.1 is backwards compatible with speex 1.0 >> > and can be used as a drop in replacement >> > for audio/speex >> > >> > and the only reason for not upgrading multimedia/speex before >> > was that speex-devel is marked broken for 4.x - this should not >> > be a concern anymore, right ? >> >> No, the main reason of that is... It is a development version, so the= >> 1.1.x stick in speex-devel is correct. > > actually 1.1.x is not development anymore, according to > > http://downloads.us.xiph.org/releases/speex/ > > speex-devel is now the 1.2 branch > Am i missing something ? Yes, it is wrong place to check. Why don't you check its website instead= = of that ftp or list of distfiles? Anyway, I will be check in several of Linux distros to see what they hav= e. = If most of them have 1.1.x, then I guess I will be happy to do the = speex-devel -> speex. Cheers, Mezz > cheers > luigi -- = mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team - FreeBSD Multimedia Hat (ports, not src) http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org http://wiki.freebsd.org/multimedia - multimedia@FreeBSD.org