From owner-freebsd-security Wed Nov 21 9: 6:14 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from kumquat.mail.uk.easynet.net (kumquat.mail.uk.easynet.net [195.40.1.42]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F48937B416 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2001 09:06:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from magrat.office.easynet.net ([195.40.3.130]) by kumquat.mail.uk.easynet.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 166ap9-0005Bq-00 for security@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 21 Nov 2001 17:06:11 +0000 Received: by MAGRAT with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 21 Nov 2001 17:06:11 -0000 Message-ID: <7052044C7D7AD511A20200508B5A9C585169B7@MAGRAT> From: Lee Brotherston To: security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: Best security topology for FreeBSD Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 17:06:11 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org | I would use ipfilter for filtering and NAT (if needed), since it is | actually better at doing that, and ipfw for bandwidth limiting/traffic | shaping. If you're getting into shaping, then Dummynet is worth a peek, you do need ipfw for that. Lee To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message