Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 19:37:14 -0400 From: Robert Simmons <rsimmons0@gmail.com> To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Automatic Geli? Message-ID: <CA%2BQLa9Ar8pGCLYq%2Ba-7EFTH0VQjRHVO3TC8Et_bB9M7ACn483g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <11610157719.20120416151122@serebryakov.spb.ru> References: <COL115-W4014B9D06091DFE170C09BA5370@phx.gbl> <20120411093458.GC1319@garage.freebsd.pl> <4f864bb4.Q7/highsGaOoTKF6%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <CA%2BQLa9AVHELB%2B=BPZ611cu3v4vWxpKoFMe91Sdnk=0RtSB%2BMFw@mail.gmail.com> <COL115-W3652CA2CA7D42ABD3B6568A53A0@phx.gbl> <CA%2BQLa9Cu3LRUvir6U=typDE8ZrtusjGH1N4rGUpwX1iMwku-RQ@mail.gmail.com> <11610157719.20120416151122@serebryakov.spb.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Lev Serebryakov <lev@freebsd.org> wrote: > Hello, Robert. > You wrote 13 =D0=B0=D0=BF=D1=80=D0=B5=D0=BB=D1=8F 2012 =D0=B3., 3:10:44: > >> Fascinating. =C2=A0A blank passphrase. =C2=A0What's the point? > =C2=A0To stop script-kiddies with Windows from reading sources of their > ``know-how'' -- web UI for standard caching software, I belive. Do you honestly believe that a company that is making a product should be worried about script kiddies with windows. HA! Properly implemented security has an added side effect of also keeping script kiddies out, but believe me, script kiddies should not be your target. If they are, then your product will fail. Examples: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CueCat http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_Scramble_System History is littered with failed products that share your idea of security.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BQLa9Ar8pGCLYq%2Ba-7EFTH0VQjRHVO3TC8Et_bB9M7ACn483g>