From owner-freebsd-bugbusters@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 9 17:29:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugbusters@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugbusters@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96C7A16A407; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 17:29:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from flz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp4-g19.free.fr (smtp4-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA4EF43D79; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 17:29:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.xbsd.org (unknown [82.233.2.192]) by smtp4-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAA3054CB7; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 19:29:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost.xbsd.org [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.xbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCC0711973; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 19:29:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.xbsd.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (srv1.xbsd.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 50452-05; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 19:29:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from cream.stl.xbsd.org (cream.xbsd.org [193.120.13.130]) by smtp.xbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D182D11476; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 19:29:19 +0200 (CEST) From: Florent Thoumie To: Tom Rhodes In-Reply-To: <20061009132351.02936cbd.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> References: <1160390064.76522.23.camel@mayday.esat.net> <20061009121957.01d50670.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <1160413542.6936.4.camel@localhost> <20061009132351.02936cbd.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Uqp21FuCxNEDeLV0WiBe" Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 18:29:17 +0100 Message-Id: <1160414957.6936.13.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at xbsd.org Cc: freebsd-bugbusters@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Test-Bugathon.... check X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugbusters@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Coordination of the Problem Report handling effort." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 17:29:42 -0000 --=-Uqp21FuCxNEDeLV0WiBe Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 13:23 -0400, Tom Rhodes wrote: > On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 18:05:42 +0100 > Florent Thoumie wrote: >=20 > > On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 12:19 -0400, Tom Rhodes wrote: > > > On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 11:34:24 +0100 > > > Florent Thoumie wrote: > > >=20 > > > > Following the example of our friends from NetBSD. We organized this > > > > week-end what they called a Bugathon. Basically, people gather on a= n IRC > > > > channel and discuss about some Problem Reports they either sent or = are > > > > interested in. This is a great opportunity to get things done faste= r and > > > > get in touch with committers. > > > >=20 > > > > The Bugathon was only announced on -ports because we weren't sure t= o get > > > > enough src committers, mainly because of the very short notice (it = was > > > > decided on friday evening CET). > > > >=20 > > > > Anyway, the result of the Test-Bugathon is that around 140 PRs have= been > > > > closed (kern:8, bin:2, ports:~100, i386:1, docs:7, www:4, usb:14, > > > > conf:4, amd64:1). I'd like to thank all the committers and particip= ants > > > > who came, it was a lot of fun. > > > >=20 > > > > The test has proven its point so we'll definitely make new bugathon= s in > > > > the near future. We haven't settled on a date yet, but an announcem= ent > > > > will be made once the date will be decided, at least two weeks befo= re > > > > the event. > > > >=20 > > > > In the meantime, don't hesitate to come to the IRC channel > > > > #freebsd-bugbusters on EFNET or subscribe to the freebsd-bugbusters > > > > mailing list. > > > >=20 > > > > Have fun fixing bugs! > > >=20 > > > I agree with Ceri, having a bug busting marathon during release > > > cycle is probably bad; however, insta-MFCs are probably not a > > > good thing anyway - even with single word fixes. I'll be keeping > > > all of my changes in a new mailbox file. Once release cycle is > > > over, the MFC will happen. > >=20 > > Well, HEAD isn't frozen and fixing bugs can't be bad. > >=20 > > > I think the doc count is below correct. Ceri closed at least > > > 4 IIRC, and I closed about 4-5 (some assigned to me). But > > > whatever, we'll need to keep a "score board" next time. > >=20 > > This will be the next feature of BugBuster, the Evil Bot, but it still > > requires that committers say when they close a PR. > >=20 >=20 > Like: !closed NUM || !closed doc || !closed ? :) Yeah, kinda :-) --=20 Florent Thoumie flz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD Committer --=-Uqp21FuCxNEDeLV0WiBe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFKobtMxEkbVFH3PQRAlw/AJ9ZLaPCGkIZWiACfbtxZNOutVieygCeMaQA EtAEw2TxegW2vQ/3DkK7yLQ= =OfPm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Uqp21FuCxNEDeLV0WiBe--