From owner-freebsd-ports  Sat Jan 17 05:44:00 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA28449
          for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Sat, 17 Jan 1998 05:44:00 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.119.24.10])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA27656;
          Sat, 17 Jan 1998 05:33:24 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net)
Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [194.198.43.36])
	by ns1.yes.no (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA01092;
	Sat, 17 Jan 1998 13:33:19 GMT
Received: (from eivind@localhost)
	by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.6/8.8.6) id OAA05611;
	Sat, 17 Jan 1998 14:33:17 +0100 (MET)
To: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.pp.ru>
Cc: Satoshi Asami <asami@cs.berkeley.edu>, gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG,
        ports@FreeBSD.ORG, committers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: amanda port, empty PATCH_STRIP= lines causes trouble
References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980117071258.2795A-100000@lsd.relcom.eu.net>
From: Eivind Eklund <perhaps@yes.no>
Date: 17 Jan 1998 14:33:16 +0100
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980117071258.2795A-100000@lsd.relcom.eu.net>
Message-ID: <86d8hr5ioz.fsf@bitbox.follo.net>
Lines: 15
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.52/XEmacs 20.2
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

* Andrey Chernov
| We could not spent time to understanding, just upgrade -stable to
| new patch as I suggest.

* Satoshi Asami
| No.

* Andrey Chernov
| Why?

Because this break support for older 2.2 machines, for one.  Besides,
"just making it work" without understanding the ramifications are a
very bad idea for important utilities (like the ports collection).

Eivind.