From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 23 19:46:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [69.147.83.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 998B61065672; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 19:46:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23D88163E52; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 19:43:56 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <503687FB.5020301@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 12:43:55 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: obrien@freebsd.org References: <201208221835.q7MIZI77076855@svn.freebsd.org> <50355121.3070408@FreeBSD.org> <20120822222511.GD78670@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <20120822222511.GD78670@dragon.NUXI.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.3 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r239568 - head/etc/rc.d X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 19:46:19 -0000 On 8/22/2012 3:25 PM, David O'Brien wrote: > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 02:37:37PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: >> Were these changes discussed somewhere and I missed it? > > They were not discussed. I did not see the need. > > This is simple functionality. If securelevel is raised > 0, one > cannot start up a firewall nor make major changes to time. > Thus these components are required to be done before raising securelevel. > > >> I'm not opposed per se, but the security aspects should be discussed on >> freebsd-security@, > > I'm sorry, I didn't feel that ensuring the software follows the > published specification of its functionality to have such a security > aspect. > >> and it's preferable that significant changes to >> rcorder be looked at on freebsd-rc@ as well. > > I don't consider this to be a significant change. > > I do have some significant changes that I do want freebsd-rc@ to > review I will be sending soon. > >> Can you hold off on MFC'ing any of this until it's been reviewed more >> thoroughly? > > Yes. Thanks. Just to reiterate, I'm not saying that either your changes or your methodology were wrong ... I personally would just like a little time to review them before we move forward. Doug -- I am only one, but I am one. I cannot do everything, but I can do something. And I will not let what I cannot do interfere with what I can do. -- Edward Everett Hale, (1822 - 1909)