From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 4 15:53:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 466C6106564A for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 15:53:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f54.google.com (mail-pz0-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E658FC08 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 15:53:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dadr6 with SMTP id r6so4318161dad.13 for ; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 08:53:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=ZK+A5GJlnt1jgAlTIhsvNHSfVVVeOt1ddg875Tfhh0g=; b=Fn/HoF8hQQ2ebEia7+eqXso6AI9Ds0Z4FVV1eJ8imWa0ID/z2OP8SB9shMpC7SjYK6 n5X3nT9UnsKuq/vDbFzN9k8dhpGL1d0ZlZfWv28OAz2DIRHTXJZXkvao998qNcb0ch/l eHlRTGWVvHI1s3LmqoLx6AuO9ajz26P4uqPu0= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=ZK+A5GJlnt1jgAlTIhsvNHSfVVVeOt1ddg875Tfhh0g=; b=Cv0Z9IMi/gqbYk2U/jSBOUuB7/MV566fzhjg5BOyEMAtYLOVgwBQ7S3ralfrskl5F1 2HgvL6GT3Sl5Ohk2gd7VljNb6kP3XVSvYTJCWrYKsDL0XaAf+hVX5o5pUN1YRiEKIp70 ScQy6xZvievCVQj0fgNnPIyPqYPPt4fdsEajjZSvDEg914VDNX/mpyiBxdHFGvO+4IjN m8chqCZa/0BnGQi0c7vUZjeuxZuozvmWyT7Jwe6PTV3nmlmtuFkBDRt17lea1rk2dk1D Gn31tIl0HOI1ksEs/iD8YwW4CQjBtPMBctqdnyWw+6sVQCKRnmtofWYectWAbWjgX5ol 6RiA== Received: by 10.66.89.6 with SMTP id bk6mr41921099pab.81.1346774023577; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 08:53:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.67.4.227 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 08:53:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <53c5133d8fac4f4353eda0add82e2234@viper-webmail.viper.enta.net> References: <53c5133d8fac4f4353eda0add82e2234@viper-webmail.viper.enta.net> From: Eitan Adler Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 11:53:12 -0400 Message-ID: To: Jake Smith Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnnW146McTGR98m0zp8sOrQBn0a+co2PCvH65NnwdSTM12R7MMoaZd8DmVnHS/DTlMtmNRQ Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Building with WITH_DEBUG (-g) in make.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:53:44 -0000 [ please only choose one mailing list for now on, cross posting is discouraged ] On 4 September 2012 05:26, Jake Smith wrote: > Hi, > It got me thinking, is there any reason why it would be a bad idea to build > all my ports with debug symbols from now on? > Are there any performance hits Yes. Code size grows and the flags may enable internal debugging in the program itself. > or security risks with this? no. -- Eitan Adler