Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 17:20:19 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: platanthera <platanthera@web.de> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: COPTFLAGS (not?) only for compiling the kernel? Message-ID: <20040514002019.GA26087@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <200405140201.15120.platanthera@web.de> References: <200405132329.07892.platanthera@web.de> <200405140139.35007.platanthera@web.de> <20040513234135.GD22583@xor.obsecurity.org> <200405140201.15120.platanthera@web.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 02:01:15AM +0200, platanthera wrote: > Just one last question (slightly getting OT) - are CFLAGS settings on=20 > FreeBSD more critical than on Linux? > http://www.freehackers.org/gentoo/gccflags/flag_gcc3.html recommends=20 > -O3 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer 'for those who don't want to experiment,= =20 > want a stable system, but still optimized..' Perhaps Linux users don't mind (or don't notice ;-) strange instability in their systems :-) Kris --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFApBDCWry0BWjoQKURAk/nAKCrYybv46iO3yO4ZnNUpftgC0QQhQCfdJNf XNqqZg2mD+79rvXllqjaT20= =TAl1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040514002019.GA26087>