From owner-cvs-all Fri Jun 21 12:11:21 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFCBD37B435; Fri, 21 Jun 2002 12:10:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bde.zeta.org.au (bde.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.102]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id FAA13151; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 05:10:32 +1000 Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 05:15:29 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: bde@gamplex.bde.org To: "David E. O'Brien" Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/gcc toplev.c In-Reply-To: <200206211821.g5LILU333022@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20020622050504.U5440-100000@gamplex.bde.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, David E. O'Brien wrote: > obrien 2002/06/21 11:21:30 PDT > > Modified files: > contrib/gcc toplev.c > Log: > cc -O0 and -O1 didn't do the easy optimization of alignment for space. > Instead it attempted to do the easy optimization of alignment for time, > which should be to 1-byte alignment on i386's. > > Submitted by: bde Urk, I seem to have mangled my N-tuple negatives there. -O0 and -O1 actually optimized alignment for space, but they should optimize alignment for time like they used to. Optimization for space should give 1-byte alignment on i386's, but doesn't quite. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message