From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Fri Aug 19 13:20:53 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B5B5BBEED2; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 13:20:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.contact@marino.st) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 280F9159C; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 13:20:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.contact@marino.st) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ip70-178-28-115.ks.ks.cox.net [70.178.28.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EC3443C43; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 08:20:44 -0500 (CDT) From: John Marino Subject: Re: svn commit: r420444 - head/sysutils/gosa Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org References: <201608190323.u7J3NYaH003486@repo.freebsd.org> To: Mathieu Arnold , John Marino , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Message-ID: Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 08:20:44 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 160818-2, 08/18/2016), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 13:20:53 -0000 On 8/19/2016 03:45, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > > > +--On 19 août 2016 03:23:34 +0000 John Marino wrote: > | Author: marino > | Date: Fri Aug 19 03:23:34 2016 > | New Revision: 420444 > | URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/420444 > > If it needs PHP53-, it should have a DEPRECATION_DATE soon(tm) so that it > does not stay in the tree if unusable. > My logic was that this port may be easily fixable with an upgrade to the last version and barring that happening, it would get caught in a future "broken for 6 more than six months" sweep. Lots of ports are marked BROKEN indefinitely without deprecation. John --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus