Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 17:16:42 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Vitaly Magerya <vmagerya@gmail.com> Cc: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: OPTIONS-NG (was: port variants) Message-ID: <20120416151642.GS1569@azathoth.lan> In-Reply-To: <CAL409Kwqh4NLj4yEJJaDDNFyNFxE74czqMq4Kk2oBZoKTmWtMw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAL409Kwqh4NLj4yEJJaDDNFyNFxE74czqMq4Kk2oBZoKTmWtMw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Cbvl/UgeRTPlujdB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 12:54:07AM +0300, Vitaly Magerya wrote: > Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@freebsd.org> wrote: > > I hope things will change once we get OPTIONS-NG in, since the new > > framework will address (AFAIK) all the objections people have against > > our current OPTIONS. >=20 > Is that a thing in existence? Is there anywhere I can read about it? http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/optionsng.pdf It is almost finish, missing someone to polish it. regards, Bapt --Cbvl/UgeRTPlujdB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk+MN9oACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EzMXgCfe1Pkial1QeIlhOp3jJ8xfD4L 6wQAoJC1l1AN+sH5PetuBMGPAWgcn7Da =Nnv5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Cbvl/UgeRTPlujdB--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120416151642.GS1569>