From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Nov 16 11:47:47 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53AE037B401 for ; Sat, 16 Nov 2002 11:47:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from bsd.ultra-secure.de (bsd.ultra-secure.de [62.146.46.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5847F43E6E for ; Sat, 16 Nov 2002 11:47:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rainer@bsd.ultra-secure.de) Received: (qmail 54993 invoked by uid 1001); 16 Nov 2002 19:47:53 -0000 Message-ID: <20021116194753.54992.qmail@bsd.ultra-secure.de> From: "Rainer Duffner" To: chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp Cc: ports@freebsd.org, security-team@freebsd.org Subject: povray checksum seems to have changed Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 20:47:53 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, it seems that povray's checksum has changed. Does anyone have a tarball that matches the original checksum and make a comparison ? The file on the ftp-server still carries a date of August 1st. The distinfo is from September 4th. untar-ing the file , it claims to have been repackaged on October 22nd. With recent events, I don't like NO_CHECKSUM=YES anymore ;-) cheers, Rainer -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Rainer Duffner Munich rainer@ultra-secure.de Germany http://www.i-duffner.de Freising ======================================== When shall we three meet again In thunder, lightning, or in rain? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message