From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 21 09:22:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C8316A4CE; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 09:22:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from segfault.kiev.ua (segfault.kiev.ua [193.193.193.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26FD543D39; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 09:22:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from netch@iv.nn.kiev.ua) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by segfault.kiev.ua (8) with UUCP id i2LHMXxU025936; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 19:22:33 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from netch@iv.nn.kiev.ua) Received: (from netch@localhost) by iv.nn.kiev.ua (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) id i2LHJ0Wh003761; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 19:19:00 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from netch) Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 19:19:00 +0200 From: Valentin Nechayev To: "David O'Brien" Message-ID: <20040321171900.GA3001@iv.nn.kiev.ua> References: <200402181107.i1IB7DKX058037@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040218210517.GA58627@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040218232055.GC61242@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040218232055.GC61242@dragon.nuxi.com> X-42: On Organization: Dark side of coredump cc: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav cc: Oliver Eikemeier cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/lang/egcs/files patch-cp%decl.c patch-cp%ptree.c patch-cp::decl.c patch-cp::ptree.c patch-libiberty%Makefile.in patch-libiberty::Makefile.in ports/mail/exim-old/files patch-src%smtp_in.c patch-src::smtp_in.c ports/sysutils/e2fsprogs/files patch-intl%Makefile.in ... X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 17:22:39 -0000 > >> DON'T use '::' either! It causes problems with Bash. >> You seem to be the only one to consider that a problem. Maybe you >> should try to solve it at your end rather than attempt to impose your >> will on the rest of the community? DOB> We have alot more Bash users than users trying to put /usr/ports into DOB> Perforce. The 0.1% using Perforce can simply escape the %'s. I'm bash user (I'm too lazy to switch to zsh;))), but see no problems with `::' But if one needs shell-safe infix, `--' is good. -netch-