From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 14 01:18:57 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C0C337B401; Sat, 14 Jun 2003 01:18:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.BAYAREA.NET [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B066043FBD; Sat, 14 Jun 2003 01:18:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (athlon.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.3]) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5E8IshS038328; Sat, 14 Jun 2003 01:18:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@piii.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: from athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5E8IsLg006987; Sat, 14 Jun 2003 01:18:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h5E8Irba006986; Sat, 14 Jun 2003 01:18:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 01:18:53 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: David Xu Message-ID: <20030614081853.GD5563@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <20030614064617.5FD8837B404@hub.freebsd.org> <002901c33242$1b47da70$0701a8c0@tiger> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <002901c33242$1b47da70$0701a8c0@tiger> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PTHREADED -> P_SA X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 08:18:57 -0000 On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 02:56:36PM +0800, David Xu wrote: > > > I will rename flag P_THREADED to P_SA in kernel, any objections ? > > here is the patch: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~davidxu/P_SA.diff > > > > It's only semantics.. > > but it's been changes before.. is this the final name? > > Yes, I think it should be final. P_THREADED says more than P_SA for someone who's not intimate with the code. I for one don't know what SA stands for, but apparently it's some kind of threading model/implementation if I can believe the comments. In that case I don't know what's so wrong about P_THREADED. So, why is P_SA better than P_THREADED? -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net