From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Sep 11 18:51:10 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A6FF16A407;
	Mon, 11 Sep 2006 18:51:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from admin@intron.ac)
Received: from intron.ac (unknown [210.51.165.237])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97ABB43D49;
	Mon, 11 Sep 2006 18:51:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from admin@intron.ac)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1003)
	by intron.ac with local; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 02:51:07 +0800
	id 0010E408.4505B01B.00012841
References: <200609100956.k8A9uD0P094639@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<200609111145.52446.jhb@freebsd.org>
	<20060911193600.7ab43fb6@Magellan.Leidinger.net>
In-Reply-To: <20060911193600.7ab43fb6@Magellan.Leidinger.net>
From: "Intron is my alias on the Internet" <mag@intron.ac>
To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 02:51:07 +0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <courier.4505B01B.00012841@intron.ac>
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Alexander Leidinger <netchild@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 105930 for review
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 18:51:10 -0000

Alexander Leidinger wrote:

> Quoting John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> (Mon, 11 Sep 2006 11:45:52 -0400):
> 
>> On Sunday 10 September 2006 05:56, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>> > 	PROBLEMS:
>> > 	
>> > 	1. Why does uma_zdestroy(9) print message like:
>> > 	
>> > 	      Freed UMA keg was not empty (100 items).  Lost 2 pages of memory.
>> > 	
>> > 	   Does it represent any problems?
>> 
>> It means a memory leak.
> 
> Because this is verbatim from the submitter and I don't know if he is
> subscribed to perforce@, we should tell him about it... CCed. :-)
> 
> Bye,
> Alexander.
> 

But I have ensure that calling to uma_zalloc() and calling to uma_zfree()
appear strictly in pair in my code. Even the simplest testing program
can still lead to this kind of warning message (uma_zfree() is just next
to uma_zalloc()):

uma_zalloc(...);
uma_zfree(...);

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                From Beijing, China