From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 17 05:14:27 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EB2437B401 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 05:14:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mooseriver.com (adsl-68-73-114-183.dsl.emhril.ameritech.net [68.73.114.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D49AC43FB1 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 05:14:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jgrosch@mooseriver.com) Received: by mooseriver.com (Postfix, from userid 200) id 36F5017F; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 07:14:24 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 07:14:24 -0500 From: Josef Grosch To: "M. Warner Losh" Message-ID: <20030617121424.GA11867@mooseriver.com> References: <3EEF00E4.9000908@freebsd.mheller.org> <20030617.060806.42773474.imp@bsdimp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030617.060806.42773474.imp@bsdimp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Interview in Byte with Chris Sontag/SCO and FUD relating to BSDsettlement agreement X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: jgrosch@MooseRiver.com List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 12:14:27 -0000 On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 06:08:06AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <3EEF00E4.9000908@freebsd.mheller.org> > Martin Heller writes: > : Will the FreeBSD project issue an offical statement relating to these > : allegations? > : What will happen to FreeBSD if SCO aims at the BSD projects. Could SCO > : revoke the Settlement Agreement and pursue a court ruling? > > This is not an official statement from the project. > > There is not now, nor has there *EVER* been *ANY* System V code in > BSD. *EVER*. NEVER. NEVER. NEVER. The IP connected with the BSD > suit of the early 1990s derived from pre System V and System III > versions of Unix. In fact, Version 7 unix has more Berkeley > copyrights in it than AT&T copyright notices. > > The settlement terms specifically state that SCO cannot sue anybody > who makes a release based on 4.4-LITE. The settlement agreement is > BINDING on both parties. SCO cannot revoke it, and will have a hell > of a legal fight if they try. > > Warner Where can one find a copy of the settlement agreement? Josef -- Josef Grosch | Another day closer to a | FreeBSD 5.1 jgrosch@MooseRiver.com | Micro$oft free world | www.bafug.org