From owner-svn-src-head@freebsd.org Thu Jun 2 14:35:50 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D909B60726; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 14:35:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from mail.turbocat.net (mail.turbocat.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:d16:4514::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39AF1101E; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 14:35:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from laptop015.home.selasky.org (unknown [62.141.129.119]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.turbocat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6A5291FE024; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 16:35:48 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: svn commit: r301197 - head/sys/dev/xen/netfront To: =?UTF-8?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=c3=a9?= References: <201606021114.u52BEQqB047172@repo.freebsd.org> <2c81e44d-65de-10f0-8837-f23896855150@selasky.org> <20160602125422.gmdsueoeu5fiiec5@mac> <20160602142824.m6d24n2rx3i2kclt@mac> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org From: Hans Petter Selasky Message-ID: Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 16:39:11 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160602142824.m6d24n2rx3i2kclt@mac> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 14:35:50 -0000 On 06/02/16 16:28, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > Thanks for the clarification. I did get the impression that callout_reset > already distributed the callbacks across the number of available CPUs, maybe > the man page should be expanded to explain this? Hi, It makes sense that callout_reset() should distribute callouts by default, though I can imagine that that there are applications which depend on a strict callback order for timeouts. +1 --HPS