From owner-cvs-all Sun Apr 8 6:40: 3 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9CBC37B42C; Sun, 8 Apr 2001 06:39:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA81103; Sun, 8 Apr 2001 15:39:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/fs/pseudofs pseudofs.c pseudofs.h pseudofs_fileno.c pseudofs_internal.h pseudofs_vncache.c pseudofs_vnops.c References: <97381.986730054@critter> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 08 Apr 2001 15:39:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: Poul-Henning Kamp's message of "Sun, 08 Apr 2001 13:40:54 +0200" Message-ID: Lines: 12 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Poul-Henning Kamp writes: > In message , Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: > > It supplies a common framework for procfs, linprocfs and other similar > > fs'es (e.g. kernfs, if we hadn't nuked it). > So basically the "UFS" off pseudo-FS's ? I don't know the fs system well enough to fully understand your question. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message