From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Thu Jul 12 21:11:56 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 646401046FB2 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 21:11:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1F5980A85 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 21:11:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id w6CLBjjg080377; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 14:11:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd-rwg@localhost) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id w6CLBjP2080376; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 14:11:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <201807122111.w6CLBjP2080376@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: Retiring two more: Atmel and Xscale In-Reply-To: To: Warner Losh Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 14:11:45 -0700 (PDT) CC: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 21:11:56 -0000 > I'd like to retire Atmel and Xscale support prior to 12. The atmel stuff > has been dodgy for a long time and generally lacks the memory to run > FreeBSD well. We have no current users of it. > > The Xscale stuff is old enough to not be relevant. There's no known users. > Part of it is already set to go with the big endian stuff, but is there a > reason to keep the rest? I thought a depreciation policy was in process to help deal with all of these. -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org