From owner-freebsd-smp Fri Apr 23 15:25:23 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (castles539.castles.com [208.214.165.103]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D617154F9 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 1999 15:25:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA00351; Fri, 23 Apr 1999 07:35:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199904231435.HAA00351@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: "Daniel J. O'Connor" Cc: freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Really slow SMP In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 21 Apr 1999 21:35:50 +0930." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 07:35:00 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Well, the subject says it all :) > > I have a dual pii-350 system, and I updated to -current on the 13th, it was > running -current before (on the 7th or so). > > It was working on 7th April 20:00, and was broken on the 8th April 22:00. > (These times are CST which is 10:30 hrs ahead of GMT) > > It didn't compile on the 8th at 00:00 (missing getmtrr() and friends) > > The diff's between those two dates have only one 'interesting' thing.. all the > getmtrr() et al calls where #if'd out. > > Hmm, well now I feel like I have 2 and 2 and it doesn't add up to 4 =) Just out of curiosity; can you send me the output of "memcontrol list"? -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message