From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 9 21:44:25 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 556FFA25; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 21:44:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B2E7CF5; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 21:44:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.120.92] (095-097-241-198.static.chello.nl [95.97.241.198]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E85BF43BE9; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 16:44:12 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <540F74AB.3020605@marino.st> Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 23:44:11 +0200 From: John Marino Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bryan Drewery , Antoine Brodin , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r367783 - head References: <201409092112.s89LCtUa094817@svn.freebsd.org> <540F6E85.2050105@marino.st> <540F70A7.6030904@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <540F70A7.6030904@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 21:44:25 -0000 On 9/9/2014 23:27, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 9/9/2014 4:17 PM, John Marino wrote: > I understand your reaction, but it's just the longstanding convention. I > find it a bit rude too, but it speaks to the quality we expect of each > other. Had this all not been fixed quickly we would not have packages > this week. The pointy hat was on the MOVED entry although I guess I deserve one for removing the port in the first place. The convention is not cool. I say it's time to retire this tradition. If one really wants to make a point, send a private email. Have some class, this is just rubbing a mistake in somebody's face. This does not make somebody's work better since they'll know about the error when they see the commit. John