From owner-freebsd-isp  Sat Sep  6 12:49:53 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-isp>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA29019
          for isp-outgoing; Sat, 6 Sep 1997 12:49:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alpha.telconet.com (telconet.com [208.147.164.2])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id MAA29013
          for <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>; Sat, 6 Sep 1997 12:49:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dial30.bulloch.com by alpha.telconet.com (5.65v4.0/1.1.10.5/09Apr97-1138AM)
	id AA00700; Sat, 6 Sep 1997 15:49:39 -0400
Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.19970906155223.0069ff38@bulloch.com>
X-Sender: roark@bulloch.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Demo Version 3.0.3 (32)
Date: Sat, 06 Sep 1997 15:52:23 -0400
To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
From: Michael Roark <roark@bulloch.com>
Subject: qmail v. sendmail
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

I am currently setting up one of our 'closet' machines, an old 486/33
w/16mb of ram, to serve as a Majordomo machine. I want to get as much
performance out of the machine as possible (though my expectations aren't
very high). My question: does anyone out there have any input on qmail? I
am considering dumping Sendmail for qmail (partially as an experiment), and
running Majordomo for the lists. Thought the project is down on the
priority foodchain, I don't want to waste my time with an avoidable mistake.

Any input/suggestions would be appreciated.

Thank you in advance,

Michael Roark

Systems Administrator
Simply Digital
v. 912.842.9168
f. 912.842.9130