From owner-freebsd-chat  Thu Oct 23 10:02:50 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA10587
          for chat-outgoing; Thu, 23 Oct 1997 10:02:50 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA10579
          for <freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 23 Oct 1997 10:02:48 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.v-site.net [127.0.0.1])
	by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA02448
	for <freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 23 Oct 1997 10:02:43 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199710231702.KAA02448@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96
To: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: FreeBSD in Forbes Magazine 8)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 10:02:42 -0700
From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Subject: 
              FreeBSD in Forbes magazine!
        Date: 
              Wed, 22 Oct 1997 18:44:39 GMT
        From: 
              le@put.com (Louis Epstein)
 Organization: 
              Putnam Internet Services
  Newsgroups: 
              comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc

The Nov 3rd issue of Forbes,on page 24,prints an edited version of a
letter I sent responding to an article on theirs that warns how much
cheaper WinNT (which they called a "Unix killer") was than SCO Unix in
discussing SCO's prospects.They kept my reference to FreeBSD as a
"Windows killer",which they used as a headline,but deleted my mentions
of Walnut Creek CDROM and Xi Graphics and my provocative close that
for the small business seeking cost-effective networking software,
NT shouldn't even be a blip on the screen.

The URL is there...