From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 15 20:54:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AD9F106566C; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 20:54:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1-6.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B80F08FC12; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 20:54:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.43.26] (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q6FKsoMg092293; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 16:54:50 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-ID: <50032E10.3060607@sentex.net> Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 16:54:40 -0400 From: Mike Tancsa Organization: Sentex Communications User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Przemyslaw Frasunek References: <20110513162311.GK95084@glebius.int.ru> <4DD298AD.2060905@frasunek.com> <20110517184613.GN74366@glebius.int.ru> <4FDB1D71.6050908@freebsd.lublin.pl> <20120615203142.GW28613@glebius.int.ru> <4FDBAFD7.9020606@freebsd.lublin.pl> <4FDF2F81.6030307@sentex.net> <4FDF3097.6080701@freebsd.lublin.pl> <4FE0EE62.5070905@freebsd.lublin.pl> <4FF7F2C6.5070401@freebsd.lublin.pl> <20120709081225.GJ21957@glebius.int.ru> <4FFBB7A8.90201@rdtc.ru> <4FFBCA96.3000605@freebsd.lublin.pl> In-Reply-To: <4FFBCA96.3000605@freebsd.lublin.pl> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.72 on 64.7.153.18 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Ryan Stone , Eugene Grosbein , bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net Subject: Re: mpd5/Netgraph issues after upgrading to 7.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 20:54:57 -0000 On 7/10/2012 2:24 AM, Przemyslaw Frasunek wrote: >> It seems, Przemyslaw Frasunek uses proxyarp? >> I have no such problems but I do not use proxyarp. >> Could you get rid of it, Przemyslaw? > > No, I don't use proxy ARP. I have about 300 PPPoE ng interfaces and 10 VLANs > with plain IP traffic. ARP table has only < 50 entries, all of them are dynamic. I had a new one. Unfortunately, it did not generate a coredump file for some reason. Kernel was from ~ mid Feb Fatal trap 9: general protection fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 1; apic id = 02 instruction pointer = 0x20:0xffffffff80496e59 stack pointer = 0x28:0xffffff80000863b0 frame pointer = 0x28:0xffffff80000863c0 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 13 (ng_queue1) trap number = 9 panic: general protection fault cpuid = 1 KDB: stack backtrace: #0 0xffffffff803f922e at kdb_backtrace+0x5e #1 0xffffffff803c6437 at panic+0x187 #2 0xffffffff80646e30 at trap_fatal+0x290 #3 0xffffffff8064736a at trap+0x10a #4 0xffffffff8062eb94 at calltrap+0x8 #5 0xffffffff8049835b at ng_l2tp_rcvdata_lower+0x42b #6 0xffffffff8048f380 at ng_apply_item+0x420 #7 0xffffffff80491790 at ng_snd_item+0x3f0 #8 0xffffffff804962ba at ng_ksocket_incoming2+0x24a #9 0xffffffff8048f50d at ng_apply_item+0x5ad #10 0xffffffff804912be at ngthread+0x22e #11 0xffffffff8039b08f at fork_exit+0x11f #12 0xffffffff8062f0de at fork_trampoline+0xe Uptime: 151d12h10m10s ipfw: 11 Deny TCP 192.168.1.99:33822 208.47.254.32:80 in via ng471 Dumping 883 out of 8145 MB:ipfw: 13 Deny UDP 64.7.157.21:512 192.168.254.46:137 in via ng21 panic: bufwrite: buffer is not busy??? cpuid = 1 Uptime: 151d12h10m10s -- ------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/