From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 21 02:48:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E1316A4E6 for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 02:48:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3905243D45 for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 02:48:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i28so306291nzi for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 19:48:03 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=F73BIcWeofyk9QNLFqvW9U/Sa0vCY3KE4l3dQyKi5bgg9wKsOLrinDZPH4HQSJIe7sSDAFVX2OSstGMNTm0c/5UBXtdqX4Auxfs3gibe2ByRgfCb1mjXp4uzjn2y7nGxAz3AOCUWebbTtyPky3fipz1K78v1OEH6C3hqRjWOQUo= Received: by 10.36.134.10 with SMTP id h10mr980921nzd; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 19:48:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.37.22.74 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 19:48:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 06:48:03 +0400 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" To: RW In-Reply-To: <200604210056.57359.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <8921D35B-1F12-4212-9B62-0CC1CC8F5AE5@allresearch.com> <4446D5A4.8030502@mykitchentable.net> <200604210056.57359.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW Problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 02:48:05 -0000 On 4/21/06, RW wrote: > On Thursday 20 April 2006 05:14, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > > Yes. 'setup' is from "semi-stateful" firewall functionality while > > 'keep-state' is from fully stateful one. You can't use both in > > one rule without strange consequences. Just delete 'setup' > > words in both rules - it'll probably be fine. > > > Yes you can. When I used IPFW I did it that way and never had any problem= s. My mistake.