From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Oct 20 08:25:37 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA25625 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Tue, 20 Oct 1998 08:25:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ics.com (ics.com [140.186.40.192]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA25620 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 1998 08:25:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kaleb@ics.com) Received: from ics.com (sunoco.ics.com [140.186.40.142]) by ics.com (8.9.0.Beta5/8.9.0.Beta5) with ESMTP id LAA25467 Tue, 20 Oct 1998 11:25:06 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <362CAB52.2DAE8B0A@ics.com> Date: Tue, 20 Oct 1998 11:25:06 -0400 From: "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" Organization: Integrated Computer Solutions X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5b2 [en] (X11; I; SunOS 5.5.1 sun4u) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Producing non-GPLed tools for FreeBSD References: <4.1.19981019134220.065a3be0@mail.lariat.org> <362B9D4D.500216A0@ics.com> <199810201513.IAA04309@austin.polstra.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG John Polstra wrote: > > In article <362B9D4D.500216A0@ics.com>, > Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > > > I didn't steal the Intel supplement to the ABI when I left my last job, > > No, we don't differ from it > on our ELF systems (or on our a.out systems either). Right. That was my point: gcc would have had to conform to it, and there would have been no reason for 386BSD to have changed it, or any of *BSD to have changed it. So, where is the FreeBSD ABI defined?!? -- Kaleb To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message