From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 1 14:28:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FDEC10656E4 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 14:28:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DACB8FC15 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 14:28:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 01 Mar 2009 09:28:07 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.10.4-GA) with ESMTP id POG63661; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 09:28:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from 209-6-22-188.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.22.188]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 01 Mar 2009 09:28:05 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18858.39797.40001.573615@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 09:28:05 -0500 To: Mel In-Reply-To: <200902282247.22739.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> References: <200902282247.22739.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, lacalling Subject: Re: A problem about pkg_deinstall X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 14:28:08 -0000 Mel writes: > Aside what Michael pointed out, ports-mgmt/pkg_cutleaves is much > easier for this task. It will only delete leaves, so if b is > still needed by X, it will not come up on the next iteration. And > you get to see the short description of the package, so may > decide to keep it anyway... I'd like to suggest a better solution is not auto-deleting in either direction. Even if the code were perfect - of which there is no evidence - the people are not, Unless you're (generic "you") planning to wipe out something huge (e.g. X11, or Gnome/KDE) and know _exactly_ what you're doing ... it's like hanging a "Kick me!" sign around your neck. Robert Huff