From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 09:55:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B2616A417; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:55:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@incunabulum.net) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECB4743D49; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:55:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bms@incunabulum.net) Received: from frontend3.internal (frontend3.internal [10.202.2.152]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED900DAE50F; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 05:55:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from heartbeat1.internal ([10.202.2.160]) by frontend3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 28 Sep 2006 05:55:33 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: 0eOLKkCXoiIF5YsZXXWUXIvuv6aByGvv8UAIbKuBcUnS 1159437333 Received: from [192.168.123.18] (82-35-112-254.cable.ubr07.dals.blueyonder.co.uk [82.35.112.254]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15B0672E9; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 05:55:32 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <451B9C11.2030901@incunabulum.net> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:55:29 +0100 From: Bruce M Simpson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060825) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: fenner@FreeBSD.org Subject: De-orbitting mrouted X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:55:37 -0000 Hi, I think it would be a good idea if we de-orbit /usr/sbin/mrouted in 7-CURRENT. Several reasons: 1. DVMRP is not specified for any new multicast installations; PIM is the de-facto standard now. 2. The code generates warnings during a buildworld (see bin/71633) 3. Given point (1) it probably doesn't belong in the base system; there is more interest in multicast these days because of things like zeroconf, however, DVMRP no longer belongs in a PIM world. What say thee? Regards, BMS