From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 9 11:52:08 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E68B37B401 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 11:52:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gicco.homeip.net (dclient80-218-79-153.hispeed.ch [80.218.79.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C770043FAF for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 11:52:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hampi@rootshell.be) Received: from snoopy.here (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gicco.homeip.net (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h39Iq4eN094129 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 20:52:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from hampi@rootshell.be) Received: (from idefix@localhost) by snoopy.here (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Submit) id h39Iq4ub094128 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 20:52:04 +0200 (CEST) X-Authentication-Warning: snoopy.here: idefix set sender to hampi@rootshell.be using -f Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 20:52:04 +0200 From: Hanspeter Roth To: FreeBSD User Questions List Message-ID: <20030409185204.GA94073@gicco.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD User Questions List References: <20030401213447.GB52568@gicco.homeip.net> <20030407185336.GA46448@gicco.homeip.net> <1049656689.77551.19.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20030408211303.GA766@gicco.homeip.net> <1049823815.360.13.camel@gyros> <20030409142408.GA32427@gicco.homeip.net> <1049908952.73008.8.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1049908952.73008.8.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: fc-cache got killed with 100dpi X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 18:52:08 -0000 On Apr 09 at 13:22, Joe Marcus Clarke spoke: > On Wed, 2003-04-09 at 10:24, Hanspeter Roth wrote: > > I've now removed the 100dpi port. But when installing the fontconfig > > port the make invasion occurs while > > I'll send out a workaround in a bit. I have now downloaded the portstree from 4.8 and installed it. Now I'm back to fontconfig-2.1_6. But dependancies work and I can build and install it without a problem! -Hanspeter