From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 6 23:03:31 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C32437B401; Fri, 6 Jun 2003 23:03:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (rwcrmhc51.attbi.com [204.127.198.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 063A443F75; Fri, 6 Jun 2003 23:03:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@freebsd.org) Received: from master.dougb.net (12-234-22-23.client.attbi.com[12.234.22.23]) by attbi.com (rwcrmhc51) with SMTP id <200306070603300510084i27e>; Sat, 7 Jun 2003 06:03:30 +0000 Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 23:03:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton To: Brad Knowles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20030606230108.U15459@znfgre.qbhto.arg> References: <20030605235254.W5414@znfgre.qbhto.arg> <20030606133644.GB49662@iconoplex.co.uk> Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-message-flag: Outlook -- Not just for spreading viruses anymore! MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: Paul Robinson cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Way forward with BIND 8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2003 06:03:32 -0000 On Sat, 7 Jun 2003, Brad Knowles wrote: > This is a rather different statement than you previously gave. I've been extremely consistent in saying that I'm talking about the right thing to do _now_. I purposely tried to avoid confusing the issue with detailed plans for the future, however now that I know how much interest there is in this topic, I'll give more information to start with. > But this is not at all how I interpreted your previous statements I can't be responsible for your perceptions. -- This .signature sanitized for your protection