From owner-freebsd-infiniband@freebsd.org Sat Apr 23 18:33:13 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-infiniband@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB80DB1AA7C for ; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 18:33:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from mail.turbocat.net (heidi.turbocat.net [88.198.202.214]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 937BC1BDE for ; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 18:33:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from laptop015.home.selasky.org (unknown [62.141.129.119]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.turbocat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0C40C1FE024; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 20:33:07 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Request updated/unified patch for OFED v3.2 update To: "David P. Discher" , freebsd-infiniband@freebsd.org References: <571B31B6.4070206@selasky.org> From: Hans Petter Selasky Message-ID: <571BC0A6.9070100@selasky.org> Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 20:36:22 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <571B31B6.4070206@selasky.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-infiniband@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Infiniband on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 18:33:13 -0000 On 04/23/16 10:26, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On 04/23/16 01:08, David P. Discher wrote: >> Hans and Chris - >> >> Any chance of getting an updated diff for the OFED 3.2 patches? I >> love to see if I can reproduce Chris’s IPOIB performance. I got a >> couple MT25208 InfiniHost III Ex I’d like to start using. >> >> I grabbed the D5790-9 freebsd reviews diffs, and attempted to applied >> to -head at r298494 : >> >> > > Yes, I'll update the patchset later today. It is broken because of some > changes I pushed upstream. > > --HPS Hi, You'll need to refetch D5790, D5791 and D5797. Let me know if something still doesn't apply cleanly. --HPS