From owner-freebsd-ports  Sat Mar 17 19: 7:50 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (winston.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.27.229])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A1F3A37B718; Sat, 17 Mar 2001 19:07:48 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jkh@osd.bsdi.com)
Received: from localhost (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by winston.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.2/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2I36eH98311;
	Sat, 17 Mar 2001 19:06:40 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jkh@osd.bsdi.com)
To: obrien@freebsd.org
Cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: no cvsupit package for 4.2 or 4-stable?
In-Reply-To: <20010316221311.A9580@dragon.nuxi.com>
References: <20010316124108Q.jkh@osd.bsdi.com>
	<20010316221311.A9580@dragon.nuxi.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.1 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20010317190640J.jkh@osd.bsdi.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 19:06:40 -0800
From: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@osd.bsdi.com>
X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140)
Lines: 10
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

> I don't believe interactive packages are built for the releases any more.
> Instead ports should do something reasonable if PACKAGE_BUILDING is
> defined, they should use some reasonable defaults.

Grumble - basically, if PACKAGE_BUILDING is defined then cvsupit
shouldn't declare itself interactive since the installation rule goes
out of its way not to run the install script if we're building a
package.  I'll do the deed now.

- Jordan

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message