From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Nov 26 10:06:08 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA05911 for isp-outgoing; Wed, 26 Nov 1997 10:06:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp) Received: from ns.mt.sri.com (sri-gw.MT.net [206.127.105.141]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA05899 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 1997 10:06:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nate@mt.sri.com) Received: from mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by ns.mt.sri.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id LAA11501; Wed, 26 Nov 1997 11:06:00 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from nate@rocky.mt.sri.com) Received: by mt.sri.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id LAA00705; Wed, 26 Nov 1997 11:05:57 -0700 Date: Wed, 26 Nov 1997 11:05:57 -0700 Message-Id: <199711261805.LAA00705@mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "George M. Ellenburg" Cc: "Blaine Minazzi" , Subject: Re: Web Page Restrictions In-Reply-To: <01bcfa89$5de53fe0$f828cccf@caffeine> References: <01bcfa89$5de53fe0$f828cccf@caffeine> X-Mailer: VM 6.29 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Why are we no longer using X.25 for digital communication or SLIP for > that matter? Matter of fact, I'm using SLIP locally because it's about 10% more effecient than PPP on the same line, if you disable block compression. I have VJ compression enabled, but that's it and I get much better throughput and interactive performance using it than with PPP. Just because you don't use it doesn't mean it's not in use, or still useful. Nate