Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2002 12:19:32 -0700 From: Gary D Kline <kline@thought.org> To: Joost Bekkers <joost@bps.jodocus.org>, Gary D Kline <kline@thought.org>, Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>, FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: obscure firewall and mail problem... Message-ID: <20020602191931.GA7730@tao.thought.org> In-Reply-To: <20020602205731.A4409@bps.jodocus.org> References: <200206020800.g52803901241@tao.thought.org> <3CF9F896.3000106@potentialtech.com> <20020602152128.A3792@bps.jodocus.org> <20020602174824.GA5931@tao.thought.org> <20020602205731.A4409@bps.jodocus.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 08:57:31PM +0200, Joost Bekkers wrote: > On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 10:48:24AM -0700, Gary D Kline wrote: > > > > > > ; > > ns1.thought.org. IN A 216.39.168.248 > > tao.thought.org. IN A 10.0.0.2 > > ; > > ; > > > > ; MX records > > ;thought.org. IN MX 10 ns1.thought.org. > > ; IN MX 20 tao.thought.org. > > > > > > I want everytthing to flow through ns1.thought.org and > > have mail routed to my other machines on my LAN. > > > > Do you guys see what needs fixing with my MX records? > > or is this a sendmail config issue? > > You got your mx-preference reversed. The lowest number should be > the machine where your mailbox is. > I see your point. So with:: ; MX records thought.org. IN MX 10 tao.thought.org. IN MX 20 ns1.thought.org. you think that mail through my NS1 server will flow thru and see tao first and find both "kline@tao.thought.org" and "kline@thought.org" both?? Bill, does this make sense to you too? If tao is down should I put ns1.thought.org as a mail relay/MX site? gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020602191931.GA7730>