Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 23:08:19 -0500 From: "Ryan Sommers" <ryans@gamersimpact.com> To: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.2-BETA: giving up on 4 buffers (ata) Message-ID: <20031127040819.9774.qmail@neuroflux.com> In-Reply-To: <20031126190344.GA34173@ussenterprise.ufp.org> References: <20031126183744.GA9140@merlin.emma.line.org> <20031127044934.K26615@hewey.af.speednet.com.au> <20031126190344.GA34173@ussenterprise.ufp.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I'll also note in my FreeBSD current debugging of some drivers it was > about a 50/50 shot as to if this would happen. Having to fsck every > other reboot was only made less painful by the background fsck thing. > Don't some BIOS' protect the superblocks as a kind of "virus protection"? Could this be related to them? -- Ryan "leadZERO" Sommers Gamer's Impact President ryans@gamersimpact.com ICQ: 1019590 AIM/MSN: leadZERO -= http://www.gamersimpact.com =-
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031127040819.9774.qmail>