From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Sep 3 1:42:11 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from cronus.medianetwork.se (cronus.medianetwork.se [193.14.204.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2488714D4A for ; Fri, 3 Sep 1999 01:42:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from support@junglenote.com) Received: from junglenote.com (digital25.medianetwork.se [193.14.204.243]) by cronus.medianetwork.se (8.9.3/8.7) with ESMTP id KAA25278 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 1999 10:40:04 +0200 Received: from enigmatic [127.0.0.1] by junglenote.com [localhost] with SMTP (MDaemon.v2.84.R) for ; Fri, 03 Sep 1999 10:44:12 +0200 Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Fri, 3 Sep 1999 10:44:09 +0200 Message-ID: <01BEF5F9.40F06230.support@junglenote.com> From: Dan Larsson To: "[FreeBSD-ISP-List] (E-post)" Subject: ePerl performace benchmarks Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 10:44:08 +0200 Organization: Portabla Datorer AB X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet-e-post/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Return-Path: support@junglenote.com Reply-To: support@junglenote.com Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org As I've read in the documents for ePerl there are some performace and security issues regarding installing EmbedPerl as a built in module as to a standalone interpriter. On the matter of performace does someone have any comparative figures between built in module mode and stand alone interpriter. Regards ---- Dan Larsson ( mailto:dan@junglenote.com ) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message