Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 15:30:00 GMT From: Nate Denning <nate.denning@gmail.com> To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/178116: [tcp] [panic] Kernel panic: general protection fault in tcp_do_segment Message-ID: <201305011530.r41FU03a053581@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR kern/178116; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Nate Denning <nate.denning@gmail.com> To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/178116: [tcp] [panic] Kernel panic: general protection fault in tcp_do_segment Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 09:26:04 -0600 On May 1, 2013, at 8:02 AM, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > Nate, >=20 > do you run any additional network modules: ipfw, pf, netgraph, > accept filters, etc? How your system differes from a default > installation? >=20 Yes, ipfilter, accf_http and accf_data (accf is for Apache). No ipfw, = pf, or netgraph. Output of kldstat: Id Refs Address Size Name 1 15 0xffffffff80200000 1558e18 kernel 2 1 0xffffffff81759000 2324e0 zfs.ko 3 2 0xffffffff8198c000 84e8 opensolaris.ko 4 1 0xffffffff81a12000 330db ipl.ko 5 1 0xffffffff81a46000 163a accf_http.ko 6 1 0xffffffff81a48000 cda accf_data.ko IPv4 is configured natively and IPv6 over a gif tunnel, with ipfilter = rules setup for both. Other than all that I'm not seeing anything = related to networking that is not default. > Is it possible for you to run with INVARIANTS option in the kernel? > The option adds additional debugging, thus hurts system performance, > but with it we can obtain a more informative crashdump. >=20 Yes, I can try that. Thanks, Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201305011530.r41FU03a053581>